God's Blueprints for Political Victories - Revision history

DaveLeach: /* 3 proposals | designed to implement God’s tips | in a way that minimizes human resistance */

2022-12-29T04:59:57Z

‎3 proposals | designed to implement God’s tips | in a way that minimizes human resistance

DaveLeach: /* Steve Scheffler */

2022-12-12T05:43:43Z

‎Steve Scheffler

DaveLeach: /* David Lane */

2022-12-12T05:41:57Z

‎David Lane

DaveLeach: /* Steve Scheffler */

2022-12-12T05:37:13Z

‎Steve Scheffler

DaveLeach: /* The Key to Freedom: the Cross */

2022-12-12T05:21:20Z

‎The Key to Freedom: the Cross

DaveLeach: /* The Key to Freedom: the Cross */

2022-12-12T04:54:57Z

‎The Key to Freedom: the Cross

DaveLeach: /* 2. Root problems: you will probably agree but think it foolish to say so publicly */

2022-12-12T04:03:52Z

‎2. Root problems: you will probably agree but think it foolish to say so publicly

DaveLeach: /* 1. Comments about your analysis */

2022-12-12T04:02:49Z

‎1. Comments about your analysis

DaveLeach: /* 5. Censoring God in order to give God’s positions more “credibility” is like refusing to wear clothes because they will make you naked. */

2022-12-12T04:02:10Z

‎5. Censoring God in order to give God’s positions more “credibility” is like refusing to wear clothes because they will make you naked.

DaveLeach: /* =Dr. Robert Malone */

2022-12-12T04:00:39Z

‎=Dr. Robert Malone

@@ Line 118: / Line 118: @@
 for displacing/bypassing unaccountable bureaucracy'''
-	<span style="color:blue">1. “Multitude of Counsellors” [[Multitude_Of_Counsellors_Project Project]]</span> (for political activists)
+	<span style="color:blue">1. “Multitude of Counsellors” [[Multitude_Of_Counsellors_Project]]</span> (for political activists)
 	<span style="color:blue">2. Saltshaker Papers</span> (for small groups within churches) [http://saltshaker.us/Salt/SaltshakerPapers.PDF Proposed practical rules] for groups to function as “saltshakers” within their churches.
 	<span style="color:blue">3. Wiki Website: www.SaveTheWorld/
 Saltshaker.US.</span> Join the “Save The World” Club, which is a fair way to describe God’s ignored blueprint for “Church”. I have worked to create an online forum as much like 1 Corinthians 14 fellowship as I can imagine.
 =1. “Multitude of Counsellors” Project (for political activists)=

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:43, 12 December 2022
Line 703:		Line 703:

	==Steve Scheffler==		==Steve Scheffler==
		+
		+	On December 10 I emailed Scheffler an attachment of this article. The body of the email had the first page or so of the attachment, with this introduction:
		+
		+	"Let me share my response to RIchard Viguere, a long time national political consultant who actually asked for, not money, but ideas. I mentioned to him the impact of your influence in the growth of my vision:"

	==David Lane, American Renewal Project==		==David Lane, American Renewal Project==

@@ Line 704: / Line 704: @@
 ==Steve Scheffler==
-==David Lane==
+==David Lane, American Renewal Project==
 ==Richard Viguerie==
 I emailed him this article

@@ Line 682: / Line 682: @@
 I had to register to leave a comment. The bio I submitted: "Christian 75 years, musician 70 years, Christian political activist 40 years, publisher of the Prayer & Action News 25 years."
 ==Steve Scheffler==
 ==David Lane==

@@ Line 663: / Line 663: @@
 '''The repentance of 2 Chronicles 7:14 may require many things, but since “healing of the land” is the promised reward, adamant church opposition to even consider “healing the land” a mission of church has to top the list. The adamant political activist opposition to publicly basing their agendas on the healing Words of God has to be a close second.'''
-=Record of activists to whom this has been sent-
+=Record of activists to whom this has been sent=
-[https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/why-cant-we-talk-about-it/comments?utm_source=substack,substack&publication_id=548354&post_id=88862516&utm_medium=email,email&isFreemail=true&comments=true Why can't we talk about it?]
+December 11, 2022, I posted this comment after Kirsch's question, [https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/why-cant-we-talk-about-it/comments?utm_source=substack,substack&publication_id=548354&post_id=88862516&utm_medium=email,email&isFreemail=true&comments=true Why can't we talk about it?]
-,297
+His complete question: "How are we supposed to resolve our differences if every vaccine advocate in the world refuses to have a civil discussion about it?"
-,330
+"Very powerful point. But the root problem is a lot closer to home. There is a solution, but "long experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer wrongs, than to right those wrongs to which they have become accustomed."
-How are we supposed to resolve our differences if every vaccine advocate in the world refuses to have a civil discussion about it?
+"Why are we surprised that pagans won't let us discuss evidence with them, when Christian meetings censor discussion of facts and solutions, calling that "politics"? The Bible, alone of the world's religions and philosophies, even thinks there is such a thing as "Truth" that we can discuss, much less that we should always be ready to discuss it, 1 Peter 3:15, or that it is worth dying for, Luke 12:4-5. When believers in the religion which most supports discussion of facts and solutions won't allow discussion of facts and solutions in their primary meetings, calling it "dirty" and "worldy", can we expect more support for discussion elsewhere?
-Very powerful point. But the root problem is a lot closer to home. There is a solution, but "long experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer wrongs, than to right those wrongs to which they have become accustomed."
+"The Christian resistance to discussion - to an information flow, isn't just in churches. Activists don't have time, or a system, for processing solutions longer than half a page, and you know any real solution has to be long enough to somehow address the thousands of pages of objections to it.
-Why are we surprised that pagans won't let us discuss evidence with them, when Christian meetings censor discussion of facts and solutions, calling that "politics"? The Bible, alone of the world's religions and philosophies, even thinks there is such a thing as "Truth" that we can discuss, much less that we should always be ready to discuss it, 1 Peter 3:15, or that it is worth dying for, Luke 12:4-5. When believers in the religion which most supports discussion of facts and solutions won't allow discussion of facts and solutions in their primary meetings, calling it "dirty" and "worldy", can we expect more support for discussion elsewhere?
+"My belief that God cares has led me to search for God's solution. See http://savetheworld.saltshaker.us/wiki/God's_Blueprints_for_Political_Victories."
-The Christian resistance to discussion - to an information flow, isn't just in churches. Activists don't have time, or a system, for processing solutions longer than half a page, and you know any real solution has to be long enough to somehow address the thousands of pages of objections to it.
+I had to register to leave a comment. The bio I submitted: "Christian 75 years, musician 70 years, Christian political activist 40 years, publisher of the Prayer & Action News 25 years."
-Christian 75 years, musician 70 years, Christian political activist 40 years, publisher of the Prayer & Action News 25 years

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:54, 12 December 2022
Line 662:		Line 662:

	'''The repentance of 2 Chronicles 7:14 may require many things, but since “healing of the land” is the promised reward, adamant church opposition to even consider “healing the land” a mission of church has to top the list. The adamant political activist opposition to publicly basing their agendas on the healing Words of God has to be a close second.'''		'''The repentance of 2 Chronicles 7:14 may require many things, but since “healing of the land” is the promised reward, adamant church opposition to even consider “healing the land” a mission of church has to top the list. The adamant political activist opposition to publicly basing their agendas on the healing Words of God has to be a close second.'''
		+
		+	=Record of activists to whom this has been sent-
		+
		+
		+	[https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/why-cant-we-talk-about-it/comments?utm_source=substack,substack&publication_id=548354&post_id=88862516&utm_medium=email,email&isFreemail=true&comments=true Why can't we talk about it?]
		+	STEVE KIRSCH
		+	DEC 5
		+
		+	1,297
		+
		+	1,330
		+
		+	How are we supposed to resolve our differences if every vaccine advocate in the world refuses to have a civil discussion about it?
		+
		+	Very powerful point. But the root problem is a lot closer to home. There is a solution, but "long experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer wrongs, than to right those wrongs to which they have become accustomed."
		+
		+	Why are we surprised that pagans won't let us discuss evidence with them, when Christian meetings censor discussion of facts and solutions, calling that "politics"? The Bible, alone of the world's religions and philosophies, even thinks there is such a thing as "Truth" that we can discuss, much less that we should always be ready to discuss it, 1 Peter 3:15, or that it is worth dying for, Luke 12:4-5. When believers in the religion which most supports discussion of facts and solutions won't allow discussion of facts and solutions in their primary meetings, calling it "dirty" and "worldy", can we expect more support for discussion elsewhere?
		+
		+	The Christian resistance to discussion - to an information flow, isn't just in churches. Activists don't have time, or a system, for processing solutions longer than half a page, and you know any real solution has to be long enough to somehow address the thousands of pages of objections to it.
		+	My belief that God cares has led me to search for God's solution. See http://savetheworld.saltshaker.us/wiki/God's_Blueprints_for_Political_Victories.
		+
		+
		+	Christian 75 years, musician 70 years, Christian political activist 40 years, publisher of the Prayer & Action News 25 years

@@ Line 289: / Line 289: @@
 Now, it takes more money than intelligence. A LOT more money. Then, it took a lot more intelligence. Candidates were scrutinized by well informed people who cared about Freedom.
-==2. Root problems: you will probably agree but think it foolish to say so publicly==
+==Appendix 2. Root problems: you will probably agree but think it foolish to say so publicly==
 Surely you share my frustration with such apathy among voters that it takes billions of dollars of media bombardment to  overcome it enough that free government can kind of function.
@@ Line 365: / Line 365: @@
 * the “Spectator Spirit” in both churches and politics, in which big audiences will pay to watch famous people think and talk, for entertainment, but will not use that information to help the helpless themselves. Jeremiah 5:31 The prophets ·speak lies [L prophesy falsely; Deut. 18:14–22], and the priests ·take power [rule] ·into their own hands [or by their hand/control], and my people love it this way. (EXB)
 I didn’t stop publishing for financial reasons – it never made a profit anyway. I stopped because my hope had been that people would use the information to help interact with lawmakers to solve problems, but I reached the conclusion that people were using the information only to entertain themselves, which seemed to me a waste of time better spent on contacting lawmakers myself.
 ==Appendix 3: The Tragic Cold War between Christian Activists and Christian Churches==

@@ Line 259: / Line 259: @@
-==1. Comments about your analysis==
+==Appendix 1. Comments about your analysis==
 Your interesting '''financial stats''' say liberal nonprofits raised $21+ billion, seven times more than the $3-4 billion raised by conservative nonprofits, from seven times more donors, counting donors of $1,000 average ; baby killers have raised 10 times more than prolifers and have 10 times more donors.
@@ Line 287: / Line 287: @@
 What would it be like to have voters so well informed that they educate their candidates en masse? What would it be like if a statehouse candidate held an event once a week and had as many people show up as show up for a football game? It wouldn’t take much money to run a campaign if Americans cared as much about Freedom as they care about football. Candidates used to stand on the back of a train and crowds gathered. They didn’t have to even leave the train. All it cost to hold a huge event was a train ticket. I know that because I saw it in a movie.
 Now, it takes more money than intelligence. A LOT more money. Then, it took a lot more intelligence. Candidates were scrutinized by well informed people who cared about Freedom.
 ==2. Root problems: you will probably agree but think it foolish to say so publicly==

@@ Line 575: / Line 575: @@
 Nevertheless, in the hope that you or someone you designate is still reading this, who is in a “Berean” mood, Acts 17:11, I will defend God’s relevance to Republican success in a way which should be self evident to any “Berean” not blinded by rage at a challenge to what “everyone knows will never work”.
-==5. Censoring God in order to give God’s positions more “credibility” is like refusing to wear clothes because they will make you naked.==
+==Appendix 5. Censoring God in order to give God’s positions more “credibility” is like refusing to wear clothes because they will make you naked.==
 ===No Bible, no Republicans.===
@@ Line 637: / Line 637: @@
 <span style="color:red">It’s easy to prove the noninvolvement theologies are wrong; but we have to say  they are. We have to know it, and say it. Lovers of tradition will scream, but they can’t refute it.
 Not that participants in our forums have to believe the Scriptures calling for them, or even believe the Bible is the Word of God. But to the extent those who know it are afraid to say it, commitment to God-inspired forums will be sketchy. Churches enjoy regular attendance from many because of the belief that their familiar rituals – sermons, talk sans action, severely limited input from members – is in the Bible somewhere. Regular participation in God-inspired forums will surely require showing people the Scriptures that inspire them.
 ==Dream with me.==

@@ Line 164: / Line 164: @@
 Face to face meetings, I believe, are still the very best way for humans to communicate about important issues that require consensus and group action. One limitation is that they are unavailable to people from different states. Online forums like Zoom help with that problem. I created an online wiki in an attempt to come as close as one can online, to the consensus building that is possible in person, and in a way that organizes and preserves the consensus achieved.
-==Dr. Robert Malone=
+=Dr. Robert Malone=
 ''inventor of the mRNA and DNA vaccine core platform technology1 (the original platform, not to be confused with the current mRNA COVID shots):''
@@ Line 245: / Line 245: @@
 .  Two movements are described in Revelation – one economic, and the other political – of which the United States is the unquestioned leader and even personification: capitalism, and freedom. The future for capitalism is rocky but survivable. The future for Freedom is overwhelming victory!
 =Appendices:=