Statement 1 + Footnotes - Revision history

DaveLeach at 21:11, 29 October 2023

2023-10-29T21:11:28Z

DaveLeach at 23:35, 17 October 2023

2023-10-17T23:35:52Z

DaveLeach at 23:03, 17 October 2023

2023-10-17T23:03:08Z

DaveLeach at 23:02, 17 October 2023

2023-10-17T23:02:06Z

DaveLeach at 05:00, 16 October 2023

2023-10-16T05:00:42Z

DaveLeach at 02:26, 16 October 2023

2023-10-16T02:26:48Z

DaveLeach: Created page with " {| class="wikitable" |Forum (Articles) |Offer |Partners |Rules |Tips |SaveTheWorld:FAQ |Begin! |[https://www.paypal.com/donate/?token=G3A8DgIJOtxZ..."

2023-10-16T02:25:09Z

Created page with " {| class="wikitable" |Forum (Articles) |Offer |Partners |Rules |Tips |SaveTheWorld:FAQ |Begin! |[https://www.paypal.com/donate/?token=G3A8DgIJOtxZ..."

Show changes

@@ Line 208: / Line 208: @@
 <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;This is not a call for government censorship, but for driving hostile ideologies out of schools and subsidies, and making Freedom’s enemies pay for their own attacks.
 <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;It will not close down discussion, but open the American Freedom forum wide, where Christians will be free to defend themselves and the public – and our children in public schools – will hear both sides. Maybe Christians will finally turn their gatherings into their own media as the Bible calls for. </ref>
+----
 ----
 '''FOOTNOTES'''

@@ Line 76: / Line 76: @@
 <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;....Ultimately, opposing arguments to the scientific consensus that a human’s life begins at fertilization are fallacious or focus on aspects of biology that are not relevant to the biological classification of human beings.
 <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;''26. Derek Smith, Pro-Choice Concedes: Prominent Abortion Proponents Concede The Barbarity Of Abortion, Human Defense Initiative, Nov. 7, 2018, https://perma.cc/GXH8-MAUU. See also, A New Ethic for Medicine and Society, California Medicine, Sep. 1970.
-<br>27. KVUE Austin Interview of Dr. Curtis Boyd, at 0:23, YouTube, Nov. 6, 2009, https://perma.cc/GYB2-3YFY.''</ref>
+<br>27. KVUE Austin Interview of Dr. Curtis Boyd, at 0:23, YouTube, Nov. 6, 2009, https://perma.cc/GYB2-3YFY.''
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The amicus filed in ''Dobbs v. Jackson'' (2022) by <u>Melinda Thybault / Moral Outcry</u> (www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184968/20210726175018044_41206%20pdf%20Parker%20III%20br.pdf) “only” asked SCOTUS to do what SCOTUS did: overturn Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. But her arguments support far more: outlawing abortion across America, not allowing any state to legalize murder. When she complains that modern America was stuck with 49-year-old science (there remains no scientific doubt that babies of humans are humans) that observation is still true. Dobbs could not have acknowledged modern science and turned over the fate of millions to ballot boxes.
 <span style="color:blue">38 state legislatures,
 <ref>'''More about “State Legislatures/court-recognized Fact Finders”'''

@@ Line 107: / Line 107: @@
 <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;“Until the Court decides when a fetus is a person, I see no reason to deny the defense of necessity to those who believe that the fetus is viable and is a person...At least it would get the issue squarely before the U.S. Supreme Court....” ''Detwiler v. Akron, C.A.'' No. 14385 at 22 (9th App. Dist. 1990)
 <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;If any judge in America has declared that protectable human life begins any later than fertilization, he did so without evidence, and without the agreement of Supreme Court justices. As <u>Melinda Thybault’s</u> amicus brief in Dobbs v. Jackson(2022) observes. All nine justices know better, she demonstrates, by quoting them all calling the decision to abort “painful” and “difficult”. Five of the nine added “moral”. What could make such an allegedly “safe” “procedure”, which isn’t even expensive compared with most surgeries, either “painful” or “difficult”? Nothing can account for it, if babies are mere tumors or animals. Take it out! It doesn’t belong there! The only thing that can make the decision “painful” or “difficult” is that it is a decision to murder a healthy beautiful baby. That also makes it a “moral” decision. Removing a tumor or an animal is not a “moral” decision. By these words, all nine justices prove they know unborn babies of people are people.
-<blockquote>“The Supreme Court in Gonzales unanimously came to the conclusion that abortion is a ‘difficult and painful decision,’ at 159. Gonzales stated, ‘Whether or not to have an abortion is a difficult and painful moral decision.’ The five-person majority consisted of Justices Kennedy, Roberts, Thomas, Alito and Scalia. The four Justices in dissent, Justices Ginsburg, Stevens, Souter, and Breyer, also said: ‘The Court is surely correct that, for most women, abortion is a painfully difficult decision.’ The dissent left out the word ‘moral’ as part of the difficulty. Gonzales, FN 7, at 183, per Ginsburg, dissenting. Thus, all nine justices agreed that abortion is ‘difficult’ and ‘painful.’ Why? Because at some level, most people ‘know’ or ‘sense’ that abortion kills a human life.”</quote>
+<blockquote>“The Supreme Court in Gonzales unanimously came to the conclusion that abortion is a ‘difficult and painful decision,’ at 159. Gonzales stated, ‘Whether or not to have an abortion is a difficult and painful moral decision.’ The five-person majority consisted of Justices Kennedy, Roberts, Thomas, Alito and Scalia. The four Justices in dissent, Justices Ginsburg, Stevens, Souter, and Breyer, also said: ‘The Court is surely correct that, for most women, abortion is a painfully difficult decision.’ The dissent left out the word ‘moral’ as part of the difficulty. Gonzales, FN 7, at 183, per Ginsburg, dissenting. Thus, all nine justices agreed that abortion is ‘difficult’ and ‘painful.’ Why? Because at some level, most people ‘know’ or ‘sense’ that abortion kills a human life.”</blockquote>
 <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Even abortionists admit they know better:
 <blockquote>Planned Parenthood has recently admitted through its chief physician in Missouri, that: “Sometimes the choice to end a pregnancy, even when it is a highly desired one, is a really difficult one for people”, Dr. Eisenberg, Planned Parenthood St. Louis Clinic Director.23 Abortionist Lisa Harris states: “I know that for every woman whose abortion I perform, I stop a developing human from being born . . . Abortion feels morally complicated because it stops a developing human being from being born, which, of course, it does.”24 (23 NBC News, nbcnews.com by Ericka Edwards and Ali Galarte, May 28, 2019. 24 “My Day as An Abortion Care Provider,” Oct. 22, 2019, New York Times OP/ED.)</blockquote>

@@ Line 105: / Line 105: @@
 <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;I join with those persons who believe that truly human life begins sometime between the second and third week after conception...."
 <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;A dissent by Justice Mahoney said
-<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;“Until the Court decides when a fetus is a person, I see no reason to deny the defense of necessity to those who believe that the fetus is viable and is a person...At least it would get the issue squarely before the U.S. Supreme Court....” ''Detwiler v. Akron, C.A.'' No. 14385 at 22 (9th App. Dist. 1990)    </ref>
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;“Until the Court decides when a fetus is a person, I see no reason to deny the defense of necessity to those who believe that the fetus is viable and is a person...At least it would get the issue squarely before the U.S. Supreme Court....” ''Detwiler v. Akron, C.A.'' No. 14385 at 22 (9th App. Dist. 1990)
 <span style="color:blue">and Congress.
 <ref>'''More about “Congress/court-recognized Fact Finder'''

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 |}
-Statement of Facts #5 from:
+Statement of Facts #1 from:
 =[[Reversing_Landmark_Abomination_Cases]]=

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 by [[User:DaveLeach|Dave Leach R-IA Bible Lover-musician-grandpa]] ([[User talk:DaveLeach|talk]]) 18:11, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
-<span style="color:grey"><small>''Try to imagine how a judge, reviewing a prolife law with these Findings of Facts, would be able to dodge this evidence - in fact, see if you can find ANYONE who can ''refute'' these facts - as opposed to not ''caring'' about facts - that is, to not caring about reality:''</small></span>
+<span style="color:grey"><small>''Try to imagine how a judge, reviewing a prolife law with these Findings of Facts, would be able to dodge this evidence - in fact, see if you can find ANYONE who can ''refute'' these facts - as opposed to not ''caring'' about facts - that is, not caring about reality:''</small></span>
 ====<span style="color:blue">Statement of Fact #1 of 12: Court-recognized,  court-tested Finders of Facts unanimously establish that unborn babies are fully human====