Statement 6 + Footnotes - Revision history

DaveLeach at 17:37, 29 October 2023

2023-10-29T17:37:40Z

DaveLeach at 17:34, 29 October 2023

2023-10-29T17:34:17Z

DaveLeach at 17:31, 29 October 2023

2023-10-29T17:31:32Z

DaveLeach at 17:14, 29 October 2023

2023-10-29T17:14:29Z

DaveLeach at 17:10, 29 October 2023

2023-10-29T17:10:13Z

Show changes

DaveLeach at 14:56, 29 October 2023

2023-10-29T14:56:42Z

DaveLeach at 23:17, 23 October 2023

2023-10-23T23:17:25Z

DaveLeach at 23:14, 23 October 2023

2023-10-23T23:14:50Z

DaveLeach at 20:46, 23 October 2023

2023-10-23T20:46:32Z

Show changes

DaveLeach at 20:44, 23 October 2023

2023-10-23T20:44:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:37, 29 October 2023
Line 26:		Line 26:

	'''<span style="color:blue">Finding #6: The full humanity of a tiny physical body is hard for many to grasp. But what separates us from animals isn’t physical, and has no known preconscious stage.'''		'''<span style="color:blue">Finding #6: The full humanity of a tiny physical body is hard for many to grasp. But what separates us from animals isn’t physical, and has no known preconscious stage.'''
		+
		+	<blockquote><small>DON’T READ past this 28 word paragraph unless you want an exciting adventure – legal ammunition against not only baby killing but also against the myth of the irrelevance of God in the reasoning of judges, lawmakers, and voters! Yet Roe v Wade, of all cases, "opened the door" with its sophomoric review of "theologians", and #6 comes charging through! <> These 28 words are the 6th of 12 Statements designed to get prolife laws through courts when included in their Findings of Facts. The rest of this Statement is for lawmakers who want a stronger, clearer statement, and who have the stomach for the larger battle.</small></blockquote>

	<span style="color:blue">The Supreme Court has never disagreed with Roe v. Wade’s definition of “person” as including “infused with a soul”.		<span style="color:blue">The Supreme Court has never disagreed with Roe v. Wade’s definition of “person” as including “infused with a soul”.

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;“These disciplines  [philosophy, theology, civil law, canon law] variously approached the question [of  “when life begins”] in terms of the point at which the embryo or fetus became ‘formed’ or recognizably human, or in terms of when a ‘person’ came into being, that is, infused with a ‘soul’ or ‘animated.’” Roe v. Wade, 410 US 113, 133</ref>
 <span style="color:blue">“Consciousness” is another word for what distinguishes us from animals, that has no physical explanation. Dictionaries list several differences.
-<ref><br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;More about “Dictionaries list several differences (between us and animals).”
+<ref><br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;'''More about “Dictionaries list several differences (between us and animals).”'''
 <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Judges look everywhere but in a dictionary to learn what Americans who ratified the 14th Amendment understood the word “person” to mean. In 1868, Webster’s dictionary, published in 1828, was the only American dictionary.
 <blockquote>https://webstersdictionary1828.com.  “Person: 1. An individual human being consisting of body and soul. We apply the word to living beings only, possessed of a rational nature; the body when dead is not called a person. It is applied alike to a man, woman or child. A person is a thinking intelligent being.
@@ Line 397: / Line 397: @@
 There can be “free exercise” of religions hostile to “equal protection of the laws” only to the extent their “exercise” does not threaten the rights of others or violate the laws enacted to protect them.
 <ref>
-More about “There can be ‘free exercise’ of religions which do not equally reverence all human life only to the extent their ‘exercise’ does not violate the rights of others....”
+'''More about “There can be ‘free exercise’ of religions which do not equally reverence all human life only to the extent their ‘exercise’ does not violate the rights of others....”'''
 <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;For as long as courts are allowed to remain “scrupulously neutral” about whether Molech worship stands equal with Christianity before American law, along with remaining “scrupulously neutral” about whether the babies we are slaughtering are people, “free exercise of religion” for Molech worshipers will remain perfectly logical.
 <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Will prolifers sit on their hands over this, moaning, “they have a point; they have THEIR religion TOO”, when courts give satanists a “religious exemption” from abortion restrictions, for which they have already sued in Texas? And when satanists succeed, will that courtroom “religious exemption” motivate moms to profess Satanism so they can murder their baby not only legally but with society’s admiration for standing up for their “faith”?

@@ Line 392: / Line 392: @@
 <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The age range of the victims spans from 3 months to 80 or 90 years old. Many bodies, including those of babies, are without heads.</ref>
-<span style="color:blue">American law rejects unequal law for disfavored groups, and will appropriately ignore rationales for unequal rights, while consulting the religion from which equal rights entered American law. <ref></ref>
+<span style="color:blue">American law rejects unequal law for disfavored groups, and will appropriately ignore rationales for unequal rights, while consulting the religion from which equal rights entered American law.
 <span style="color:blue">The 1st Amendment prohibition against “establishment of religion” can’t mean the Right to Life and Equal Protection of the Laws  must end because they establish rights unique to the Bible while hostile to other religions.
 Nor can it require censorship of truth because the truth favors God and the Bible.
-There can be “free exercise” of religions hostile to “equal protection of the laws” only to the extent their “exercise” does not threaten the rights of others or violate the laws enacted to protect them.<ref></ref>
+There can be “free exercise” of religions hostile to “equal protection of the laws” only to the extent their “exercise” does not threaten the rights of others or violate the laws enacted to protect them.

@@ Line 390: / Line 390: @@
 <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;“Charred remains and a CT scan of the remains show a parent and child who were bound together and burned alive by Hamas terrorists on Oct. 7. Two spinal columns—one of an adult and one of a child—can be seen in the scan. The pair were likely embracing as they burned.”
 <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Israeli Forensic team: cut, burned alive, raped (inc. very young and very old women), arms and feet cut off, beheaded.  Children tied together & burned alive. Entire families slaughtered together.
-<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The age range of the victims spans from 3 months to 80 or 90 years old. Many bodies, including those of babies, are without heads.
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The age range of the victims spans from 3 months to 80 or 90 years old. Many bodies, including those of babies, are without heads.</ref>
+<span style="color:blue">American law rejects unequal law for disfavored groups, and will appropriately ignore rationales for unequal rights, while consulting the religion from which equal rights entered American law. <ref></ref>
 <span style="color:blue">The 1st Amendment prohibition against “establishment of religion” can’t mean the Right to Life and Equal Protection of the Laws  must end because they establish rights unique to the Bible while hostile to other religions.
 Nor can it require censorship of truth because the truth favors God and the Bible.
-There can be “free exercise” of religions hostile to “equal protection of the laws” only to the extent their “exercise” does not threaten the rights of others or violate the laws enacted to protect them.
+There can be “free exercise” of religions hostile to “equal protection of the laws” only to the extent their “exercise” does not threaten the rights of others or violate the laws enacted to protect them.<ref></ref>

@@ Line 248: / Line 248: @@
 <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Based on this Hadith, “The Hanafi madhab places the point of ensoulment at 120 days after conception” according to Wikipedia’s article on “Ensoulment”. Surahs of the Koran are quoted that do not give the time of ensoulment (when a soul enters a baby). 15:31 says “do not kill your children....” 8:151 says “do not kill the soul which God has forbidden....”
 <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Roe v. Wade correctly ignored Islam as a trusted source of information about souls and babies. The preceding Hadith is stone-age superstitious on its face, and Islam is the last religion to admire for its equal rights for all humans.
-<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;'''Hinduism.''' The following paragra
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;'''Hinduism.''' The following paragragraph, from Wikipedia’s article on “Ensoulment”, summarizes Hinduism’s view of when babies get souls – a claim lawmakers and courts will do well to ignore:

@@ Line 110: / Line 110: @@
 <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;When the State occupies such a position, degeneration is felt in every individual! Lying abounds, and for this reason the State has to use its iron hand to force individuals to tell the truth, under the fear of the most horrible kinds of penalty, so that even the State can be reasonably sure to tell its falsehood. The Ten Commandments are meaningless, and  religion, therefore, is the “opiate of the people”! Marx was right if we accept his premise and system as true.
 <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;How different this is from the free ordered world in which men fear God and tell the truth because they love God! The fear of the State will not lead men to be truthful, because the State cannot know, as God knows, when lies are being told. The fear of the total State is an abomination; the fear of the Living God – and every man should know this – is the beginning of wisdom.</blockquote>
-<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Natan Sharansky explains so even a spoiled American can understand, the utter emptiness, the “life” without Life, of not being allowed to say what you know, and knowing no one around you can either. See his EpochTV.com interview at www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/natan-sharansky-on-todays-evil-empires-the-war-in-ukraine-soviet-communism-and-the-new-antisemitism-5103919</ref>
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Natan Sharansky explains so even a spoiled American can understand, the utter emptiness, the “life” without Life, of not being allowed to say what you know, and knowing no one around you can either. Being tortured is an improvement.
 <span style="color:blue">Courts must stop censoring a whole category of witnesses to the full humanity of unborn babies. Courts can’t “reject evidence as cumulative when it goes to the very root of the matter in controversy or relates to the main issue, the decision of which turns on the weight of the evidence.”

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:14, 23 October 2023
Line 104:		Line 104:

	<span style="color:blue">Courts require witnesses to “affirm” that they will “tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”. America’s definition of “establishment of religion” must allow Americans in every venue, including courts, to tell the whole truth – to affirm reality. Courts must stop punishing people for telling the whole truth – in any venue – just because the whole truth favors God.		<span style="color:blue">Courts require witnesses to “affirm” that they will “tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”. America’s definition of “establishment of religion” must allow Americans in every venue, including courts, to tell the whole truth – to affirm reality. Courts must stop punishing people for telling the whole truth – in any venue – just because the whole truth favors God.
		+	<ref>'''More about “Courts must stop punishing people for telling the...truth...just because the...truth favors God.'''
		+	<br>     A 1963 book, Author of Liberty by Carl McIntire, explains the connection between censoring God, in our public forums where voters decide to fashion our laws after the principles of Heaven or of Hell, and a culture of lies, deceit, and fraud:
		+	<blockquote>...moral degeneration...can be seen very clearly when we have a world that no longer seeks the truth. Lying, backbiting, slander, talebearing, and in short, all manner of violations of this Ninth Commandment [“Thou shalt not bear false witness”] abound on every hand. Hence, there is no peace or security. When men fear God, they will tell the truth. It is God who judges; it is God who sees and knows every lie and every thought. The fear of God will keep men clear, pure and true. The fear of God will enable them to love the truth. When the State [or the Supreme Court] sets itself up as God and no longer fears Him, manufacturing its own tales, creating its own “truth”, it rules out this commandment altogether. This is precisely what Russian censorship means today. [Update: Communist Chinese, North Korean, Facebook, and Biden administration-coordinated censorship.]
		+	<br>     When a man does not tell the truth, he is afraid to hear the truth told to another. When a man lives in a world of untruth, which he creates, he wants all others to subject to the same limitations and deceptions. The communistic state controls “truth” as it controls the individual and “his” property. It does not think that truth can stand alone, it must be socialized, too! It therefore enslaves “truth”, and there is no longer any such thing.
		+	<br>     When the State occupies such a position, degeneration is felt in every individual! Lying abounds, and for this reason the State has to use its iron hand to force individuals to tell the truth, under the fear of the most horrible kinds of penalty, so that even the State can be reasonably sure to tell its falsehood. The Ten Commandments are meaningless, and religion, therefore, is the “opiate of the people”! Marx was right if we accept his premise and system as true.
		+	<br>     How different this is from the free ordered world in which men fear God and tell the truth because they love God! The fear of the State will not lead men to be truthful, because the State cannot know, as God knows, when lies are being told. The fear of the total State is an abomination; the fear of the Living God – and every man should know this – is the beginning of wisdom.</blockquote>
		+	<br>     Natan Sharansky explains so even a spoiled American can understand, the utter emptiness, the “life” without Life, of not being allowed to say what you know, and knowing no one around you can either. See his EpochTV.com interview at www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/natan-sharansky-on-todays-evil-empires-the-war-in-ukraine-soviet-communism-and-the-new-antisemitism-5103919</ref>

	<span style="color:blue">Courts must stop censoring a whole category of witnesses to the full humanity of unborn babies. Courts can’t “reject evidence as cumulative when it goes to the very root of the matter in controversy or relates to the main issue, the decision of which turns on the weight of the evidence.”		<span style="color:blue">Courts must stop censoring a whole category of witnesses to the full humanity of unborn babies. Courts can’t “reject evidence as cumulative when it goes to the very root of the matter in controversy or relates to the main issue, the decision of which turns on the weight of the evidence.”

@@ Line 310: / Line 310: @@
 '''Headlines from the Palestinian/Israel war of October, 2023, comparing the barbarity of the Palestianians with the barbarity demanded by the Koran, supporting the controversial theory that the Palestinians are actually following the Koran'''
-<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;https://gellerreport.com/2023/10/in-israel-babies-discovered-with-their-heads-cut-off.html/?lctg=36933672
-<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;https://gellerreport.com/2023/10/watch-hamas-terrorist-admit-true-motive-for-kidnapping-babies-and-children-to-rape-them.html/?lctg=36933672
-<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/israelis-describe-hellish-scenes-in-communities-attacked-by-hamas-terrorists
-<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;https://gellerreport.com/2023/10/top-secret-hamas-documents-show-that-terrorists-intentionally-targeted-children-elementary-schools-and-youth-center.html/
-<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;https://gellerreport.com/2023/10/witness-children-were-tortured-in-front-of-their-parents-parents-in-front-of-their-children-eyes-gouged-out-fingers-chopped-off.html/?lctg=36933672
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Witness: ‘Children Were Tortured In Front of Their Parents, Parents In Front of Their Children ….Eyes Gouged Out, Fingers Chopped Off…”
-<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;By Pamela Geller - on October 19, 2023
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;We saw a couple – mother and father – sitting on their knees on the floor, heads down, hands tied behind their back
-<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;On the other side of the dining room was a seven year old boy and a girl, about 6 years old, hands tied behind their back. The bodies were tortured.
+Gouged out eyes, cut off flesh, and then shot them with their hands tied behind their backs.
-<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;There’s a new website (https://sites.google.com/view/hamas-massacre-new/home) that contains all videos and images of documented Hamas War Crimes from October 7th, including raw footage from the attacks.
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The world must know the enemy we are fighting. The enemy whose clearly stated intentions are to rid Israel of its Jews and then the world.</ref>
 <span style="color:blue">American law rejects unequal law for disfavored groups, and will appropriately ignore rationales for unequal rights, while consulting the religion from which equal rights entered American law.
@@ Line 355: / Line 353: @@
 <span style="color:blue">There can be “free exercise” of religions which do not equally reverence all human life only to the extent their “exercise” does not threaten the rights of others or violate the laws enacted to protect them.
-<ref>
+<ref>'''More about “There can be ‘free exercise’ of religions which do not equally reverence all human life only to the extent their ‘exercise’ does not violate the rights of others....”'''
-</ref>
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;For as long as courts are allowed to remain “scrupulously neutral” about whether Molech worship stands equal with Christianity before American law, along with remaining “scrupulously neutral” about whether the babies we are slaughtering are people, “free exercise of religion” for Molech worshipers will remain perfectly logical.
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Will prolifers sit on their hands over this, moaning, “they have a point; they have THEIR religion TOO”, when courts give satanists a “religious exemption” from abortion restrictions, for which they have already sued in Texas? And when satanists succeed, will that courtroom “religious exemption” motivate moms to profess Satanism so they can murder their baby not only legally but with society’s admiration for standing up for their “faith”?
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;When will prolifers end courtroom “scrupulous neutrality” about murder, using robust affirmation of the consensus of court-recognized fact finders? When will Christians and Jews challenge the equality, before American law, of the Bible with the Koran, the Satanic Bible, the  Communist Manifesto, the Humanist Manifesto, the B’hagavad Gita and Vedas, and the books of curses used by witch doctors?
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The Bible is the source of American freedom, and remains its single defender in all its essential details among religions. To prefer American freedom over the tyrannies resulting where other religions are dominant, yet “scrupulously” block preference for the Bible, is irrational and is the reason for a long line of Landmark Abomination Cases, of which murdering babies is but one item on a long list of abominations.
+Adding this phrase to Findings of Facts of a prolife bill will begin to return America to God to save the physical bodies of babies and the souls of Christian voters.
+See the section“What Happened to Unalienable Rights, and How to Get Them Back” for:
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;* Landmark Abomination Cases
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;* The satanic “church” lawsuit: empowered by court “neutrality” about religion
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;* ‘Substantive Due Process’: how SCOTUS usurped the Constitution’s Authority to Define Rights, and Congress’ Authority to Enforce Rights, into its own authority to reclassify abominations as ‘rights’
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;* Crumbling Anti-Christian dogmas (Lemon, Employment Division); how Truth can fill the vacuum – Matthew 12:44
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;* Solutions: Understanding Establishment of Religion: a Tour through Reality with the Bible as our Guide
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;* Solutions: Judicial Accountability Act: How Legislatures can stop judges from legislatingSee the section“What Happened to Unalienable Rights, and How to Get Them Back” for:
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;* Landmark Abomination Cases
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;* The satanic “church” lawsuit: empowered by court “neutrality” about religion
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;* ‘Substantive Due Process’: how SCOTUS usurped the Constitution’s Authority to Define Rights, and Congress’ Authority to Enforce Rights, into its own authority to reclassify abominations as ‘rights’
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;* Crumbling Anti-Christian dogmas (Lemon, Employment Division); how we can fill the vacuum with Truth. Matthew 12:44 (the Supreme Court has officially abandoned the Lemon Test – which  drove the Ten Commandments from schools), and a 70 page dissent by four justices shows readiness to finally overturn Employment Division v. Smith – which  Congress struggled to mitigate with the RFRA, Religious Freedom Restoration Act. But no clear, rational alternative policy for managing “free exercise of religion” as emerged capable of rationally addressing challenges like that of the satanist “church”, or of several Abomination Cases of the past.)
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;* Solutions: Understanding Establishment of Religion: a Tour through Reality with the Bible as our Guide
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;* Solutions: Judicial Accountability Act: How Legislatures can stop judges from legislating
+<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;But the Supreme Court is only a pebble in the path compared to the real obstacle to saving babies and healing American Freedom. The fundamental question before our posterity: “when the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth?” Luke 18:8</ref>
 ----